Study of the discrepancy between clinical diagnosis of death and autopsy findings at the "Rafael A. Calderón Guardia" Hospital

Authors

  • Ana María Casco Jarquín Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social, Hospital William Allen
  • Luis Carlos Mita Alban Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social, Hospital Dr. Rafael A. Calderón Guardia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v45i1.85

Keywords:

Autopsia, Necropsia, Causas de defunción

Abstract

Clinical death and anatomopathologic diagnosis do notalways coincide. Certain age groups (elderly people) carrychronic and complex pathologies of difficult diagnosis andmanagement,that could mean a higher risk of discrepancy.Therefore,the knowledge of the factors involved in such dis-crepancies is of great importance to establish feedback bet-ween the two areas .The aim of this study is to know whichare the clinical diagnosis more frequently associated to dis-crepancy and to know if there is an association or not bet-ween discrepancy and specific age groups.

Methods:The magnitude of the discrepancy,its relation withage,and the most relevant pathologies were studied retros-pectively in a group of 173 autopsies performed in adults inthe year 2000. Protocols of autopsies and files of patientswe researched. The data was analyzed by the SPSSstatistical program.

Results :We found 44,8% discrepancy between the clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings. There was an associat i o n(P=0,002) and it was directly proportional to age. The patholo-gies more related to the discrepancies in descending order we-re :respiratory infections ,miocardio pathies ,and neoplasms.

Conclusions:The frequency of discrepancies,the popula-tion and etiopathogenic associations found ,show the need ofgreater supervision in those areas and specially the need forreassessment of the autopsy procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pujol R ,Bernet M ,Castellsagué J ,Esquius J .Análisis de Concordan-cia entre diagnósticos clínicos y de autopsia en un hospital general.Anales de Medicina Interna (Madrid) 1994 ; 11 :372-6

Reglamento de Autopsia Hospitalaria y Médico Legal. La Gaceta1987; Marzo 31. Número 62.

Yesner R . Medical Center Autopsy Costs. American Journal of Clini-cal Pathology 1978 ; 69 ( Suppl ):242-244.

Gordana J ,Damir T ,Jakiae R . Autopsy Findings and ClinicalDiagnoses:Retrospective Study of 3117 Autopsies. Croatian MedicalJournal 1999 ; 40 :77-79

Chariot P ,Witt K ,Pautot V ,Porcher R ,Thomas G ,ZafraniE. Declining autopsy Rate in a French Hospital . Arch Pathol LabMed 2000 ; 124 :739 - 745.

Veress B ,Alafuzoff I . A retrospective analysis of clinical diagnosesand Autopsy Findings in 3042 cases during two different time periods.Human Pathology 1994 ; 25 :140 - 145.

Galloway M .The role of the autopsy in medical education. HospitalMedicine 1999 ; 60 :756 - 758.

Hanzlick R ,Baker P .Institutional Autopsy Rates. Arch Intern Med1998 ; 158 :1171- 1172

Venetia S,Datta B N ; A K Banerjee A K ,Banerjee C K ,KusumJ,Bhusnurmath B . Autopsy Findings and Clinical diagnoses:A re-view of 1000 cases. Human Pathology 1993 ; 24 :194 - 198.

Council on Scientific Affairs . Autopsy:A Comprehensive review ofcurrent issues. JAMA 1987 ; 258 :364 - 369.

Devers K . The changing role of the Autopsy:A social environmentalperspective. Human Pathology 1990 ; 21 :145 - 153.

Kiesel E ,Hanzlick R ,and the Autopsy Comitee of the College ofAmerican Pathologists,Northfield Illinois. Case of the month:TheAutopsy and New Technology,all that glitters is not a gold standard .Arch Intern Med 2000 ; 160 :1901-2.

Pastores S ,Halpern N . Autopsies in the ICU :We still need them!Crit Care Med 1999 ; 27 :235-36.

Blosser S ,Zimmerman H . Do autopsies of critically ill patients re-veal important findings that were clinically undetected? Crit Care Med1998; 26:1332 - 36

Tai D,El- Bilbeisi H ,Mascha E ,SanjivT ,Weidemann H ,Arro-ligaA. A study of consecutive autopsies in a medical ICU. CHEST2001 ; 119:530 - 536.

Brown H. Perceptions of the autopsy. Human Pathlogy 1990 ; 21 :154-158.

Collins K ,Hanzlick R. Case of the month:The autopsy and theliving.Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2391-92.

Belzberg H,Rivkind A. It always pays to make a diagnosis:To autopsyor not to autopsy. Crit Care Med 1998; 26 :1299-1300.

Goldman L,Sayson R,Robbins S,Cohn L,Bettmann M,WeisbergM. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. The New EnglandJournal of Medicine 1983 ; 308 :1000 - 1005.

Mort T, Yeston N. The relationship of pre mortem diagnoses and postmortem findings in a surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1999;27 :299 - 303.

Durning S,Cation L. The educational value of autopsy in a residencytraining program. Arch Intern Med 2000 ; 160 :997 - 999

Nichols L ,Aronica P . Are autopsies obsolete? Am J Clin Pathol1998; 110 :210 -218.

Marwick C. Pathologists Request Autopsy Revival. JAMA 1995,273:1889- 1891.

Fernandez P,LazaroA. Autopsy as quality assurance in the intensivecare unit. Crit Care Med 1988 ; 16 :683-685.

Marcus F. The lost art of auscultation. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159:2396.

Mangione S ,Nieman LZ . Cardiac auscultatory skills of internalmedicine and family practice trainees:A comparison of diagnosticproficiency. JAMA 1997 ; 278 :717-722.

Downloads

Published

2003-01-01

How to Cite

Study of the discrepancy between clinical diagnosis of death and autopsy findings at the "Rafael A. Calderón Guardia" Hospital. (2003). Acta Médica Costarricense , 45(1), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v45i1.85