Painful Shoulder Syndrome

Authors

  • Galia Constanza Fonseca Portilla Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social
  • Sócrates Vargas Naranjo Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social
  • Carlos E Alpizar Chacón Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social
  • Ana Yendry Moreno Cordero Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v52i4.679

Keywords:

shoulder pain, risk factors, ultrasound , infiltration, exercise, diabetes

Abstract

Aim: A painful shoulder is between the ten most frequent causes of consultation to a physiatrist. It affects a large percent of the economically active population. 5.74% of the new cases referred to the physiatrist of a metropolitan clinic during the year 2008, corresponded with a painful shoulder. The aim of this study was to investigate how the painful shoulder appears in this population. This includes the study of the demographic variables of the consulting population and the treatments that were used.
Methods: We reviewed 171 medical clinical records retrospectively of patients that consulted for a painful for shoulder shoulder syndrome during 2008 in the physiatry service of a Metropolitan health clinic that serves a population of 400 000 inhabitants from rural, urban marginal and urban areas with a second level of medical attention (specialized medical attention). Indicators like demographic variables were registered together with diagnostic and clinical evaluations, diagnostic imaging and treatments used.
Results: The average age of the patients was 55 years, 74.3% were females and in 45% the right side was involved. Frequent associated diseases were diabetes (20.9%) and psychiatric diseases (15%). A relationship between shoulder pain and fibromyalgia was found (4.3%). Treatment accomplished quality goals with prescription of exercise, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and infiltration as proposed by other authors.
Conclusion: This population followed demographic and clinic characteristics described by other authors for shoulder pain (age, gender, shoulder side). This is the first national research that shows a relationship between fibromyalgia and shoulder pain. Physical examination register could improve. Quality treatment follows international parameters

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ministerio de la Protección Social. Republica de Colombia. Guía de atención integral basada en la evidencia para hombro doloroso (GATIHD) relacionado con factores de riesgo en el trabajo. ISBN 978-958-

-1-5. Bogotá. Diciembre 2006

Huisstede BMA, Wijnhoven HA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Koes BW, Verhaar J, Picavet S. Prevalence and characteristics of complaints of the arm neck and or shoulder(CANS) in the open population. Clin J Pain 2008; 24:253-259.

Mora-Vargas K. Hombro doloroso y lesiones del manguito rotador. Caso clinico. Acta Méd Costarric 2008; 50:251-253.

Udaondo-Cascante MA, Romero G de T, Casado V. El hombro doloroso a través del razonamiento clínico. MEDIFAM 2003; 13:186-190.

Rodríguez- J L. Dolor osteomuscular y reumatológico. Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2004; 11:94-102.

Ortiz Corredor F. Evaluación y tratamiento del dolor músculo esquelético común. En Fonseca GC, Manual de Medicina de Rehabilitación. Segunda edición. Bogotá, Colombia 2008; 289-291.

Marín- M, Navarro MJ, Peiro S., Trenor-Gomis C , Paya-Rubio A , Bernal-Delgado E , Hernandez-Royo A. La calidad de la atención al hombro doloroso. Audit Clínico Gac Sanit 2006; 20:116-23.

Schadeck de Almeida J, Carvalho G, Lamari N M. Rotator cuff disease: aspects and implications. Int JMorphol 2005; 23:381-385.

Lin JC, Weintraub N, Aragaki DR.Nonsurgical treatment for rotator cuff injury in the elderly. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2008;9:626-32.

Camargo PR, Haik, MN, Filho RB , Mattiello R, Salvini TF.Pain in workers with shoulder impingement syndrome :an assessment using the DASH and Mc Gill pain questionnaires. Rev Bras Fisioter 2007;11:161-167.

Silverstein B, Bao S, Fan Z ,Howard N,Smith C, Spielholz P, Bonauto D,Vilkari-Juntura E. ROTATOR CUFF syndrome:Personal, workrelated psychosocial and physical load factors. JOEM 2008; 50:10621076.

Ward S, Hentzen E, Smallwood , Eastlack RK, Burns K, Fithian D, Friden J, Lieber R. Rotator cuff muscle architecture, implications for glenohumeral stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 448:1587-163.

Mehlum IS, Kristensen P, Kjuus H, Wergeland E . Are occupational factors important determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in musculoskeletal pain? Scand J Work Environ Health 2008; 34:235-8.

Norman K, Floderus B, Hagman M, Toomingas A, Tornqvist EW. Musculoeskeletal symptoms in relation to work exposures at call centre companies in Sweden. Work 2008; 30:201-14

Chebli C, Matsen F A. Rotator cuff failure and treatment. Curr Opin Orthop 2006; 17:310-315.

Shrestha Bp.Sing GK, Niraula SR. Work related complaints among dentists. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2008; 47:77-81.

Byun YH, Lee JH, Park MK, Song JH, MInBH, Chang DK , Kim YH,Son HJ,Rhee Pl,KIm JJ, Rhee JC, Hwang JH,Park DI,Shim SG, Sung IK . Procedure-related musculoskeletal symptoms in gastrointestinal endoscopists in Korea .World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14:4359-64.

Alipour A, Ghaffari M, Shariati B, Jensen I, Vingard E. Occupational neck and shoulder pain among automobile manufacturing workers in Iran. Am J Ind Med 2008; 51:372-9.

Lorusso A, Bruno S, Labbate N .Musculoeskeletal complaints among Italian X-ray technologists. Ind Health 2007; 45:705-8.

Andres B, Murrell G A C.Shoulder .The biology of rotator cuff tears. Current. Orthopaedic Practice 2008; 19:516-523.

Gallo R, Sciulli R, Daffner R.Defining the relationship between cuff injury and proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 458: 70-77.

Thomas SJ, McDougall C, Brown ID, Jaberoo MC, Stearns A,Ashraf R. Prevalence of symptoms and signs of shouder problems in people with diabetes mellitus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16:748-51.

Nogueira MH, Volpon JB ,Elias J, Mucillo G .Diagnostic imaging of shoulder rotator cuff lesions. Acta Ortop Bras 2002;10:31-39.

Downloads

Published

2010-09-20

How to Cite

Painful Shoulder Syndrome. (2010). Acta Médica Costarricense , 52(4), 227-231. https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v52i4.679