Fetal karyotypes of high genetic risk pregnancies from Social Security Hospitals and Private Consultations

Authors

  • Isabel Castro Volio Instituto de Investigaciones en Salud
  • Kay Sander Mangel Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social, Hospital Dr. Rafael A. Calderón Guardia
  • Manuel Vargas Prado Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social, Hospital México
  • Luis Sánchez Chavez Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social, Hospital Dr. Rafael A. Calderón Guardia
  • Gerardo Escalante López Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social, Hospital Dr. Rafael A. Calderón Guardia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v42i1.539

Keywords:

amniocentesis, prenatal diagnosis, fetal chromosome analysis, pregnancy, sonography

Abstract

The results of 506 genetic amniocentesis and 46 percutaneous umbilical blood samplings, from 1993 to 1998, are reported. There were two main reasons for referral: abnormal ultrasound assessment (62% of cases) and advanced maternal age (23%). Most procedures (66%) were performed during the second half of pregnancy. Fetal cells were closed cultured and mass harvested. In 9% of cases fetal chromosomes were abnormal, due to trisomies 18, 21 and 13, monosomy X, mosaic trisomies 21 and 22, balanced and unbalanced translocations, extra structurally abnormal chromosomes and other defects. Two cases Of pseudomosaicism were detected. Turn around time was 15 days median. Prenatal cytogenetic and sonographic findings correlated with the phenotype Of the newborn. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal defects allowed genetic counseling as well as better obstetric management and pediatric care. Normal results of both tests provided reassurance to prospective parents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Departamento de Estadistica. Secciön Otros Programas Prioritarios. Ministerio de Salud. Diagnöstico perinatal por canton y causa, Costa Rica 1992-1994. san José: Ministerio de salud. 1995.

Organizaci6n Panamericana de la Salud. Prevenciön y control de las enfermedades genéticas y IOS defectos congénitos. Informe de un grupo de consulta. Publicaciön Cientifica N046(). Washington, D.C.: OPS, 1984.

Hsu LYE Prenatal diagnosis Of chromosomal abnormalitie.s through amniocentesis. Enl Milunsky A, ed. Genetic disorders and the fetus, diagnosis, prevention and treatment. 3a.ed., Baltimore; Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1992: 155-210.

Organizaciön Panamericana de la Salud. Ejecuciön de las actividades de salud de genética en América Latina y el Caribe. Washington. D.C. • ops, 1 987.

Annas GJ, Elias S. Legal and ethical implications of fetal diagnosis and gene therapy. Am J Med Genet 1990: 3.5:215-218.

Castro I, Mata L. El diagnostico prenatal de trastornos genéticos. Acta Med cost 1985; 28:84-91

Castro Volio I, Escalante Lopez G, Mora Palma H, Guerra Carles D. Sánchez Chaves L, Pena Obando C, Cariotipo de células fetales en el diagnöstico prenatal en Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop 1995; 43 -37.

Queenan JT. Amniocentesis, 2a. ed., Nueva Jersey: Medical Economics Books, 1985201-213.

Barch MJ, I-awce HJ, Arsham MS. Peripheral blood culture. En: Barch M], ed. The ACT cytogenetics laboratory manual. 2a.ed.. Nueva York: Raven, 1991 :17-30.

Priest JH. Prenatal chromosomal diagnosis and cell culture. Em Barch N'IJ. ed. The ACT cytogenetics laboratory manual. 2a_ed.. Nueva York: Raven, 1991 :149-203.

Philip J. The prenatal diagnosis and management Of congenital malformations in the third trimester of pregnancy, Ent Milunsky A, ed. Genetic disorders and the fetus, diagnosis, prevention, and management. 3a. ed., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. 1992:683-719

Eydoux P, Choiset A, Le Porrier N, et al. Chromosomal prenatal diagnosis: study of 936 cases of intrauterine abnormalities after ultrasound assessment. Prenat diagn 1989; 9:255-268.

Wladimiroff JW, Sachs ES, Reuss A, Stewart PA, Pijpers L, Niermeijer ME Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities in the presence of fetal structural defects. Am J Med Genet 1988; 29:289-291.

Nicolaides KH, Snidjders RJ, Gosden CM, Berry C, Campbell S. Ultrasonographically detectable markers of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Lancet 1992; 340:1109-1110.

Wilson RD, Chitayat D, McGillivray BC. Fetal ultrasound abnormalities: correlation with fetal karyotype, autopsy findings, and postnatal outcome--five year prospective study. Am J Med Genet 1992; 44:586590.

Twining P, Zuccollo J. The ultrasound markers of chromosomal disease: a retrospective study. Br J Radiol 1993; 66:408-414,

Benacerraf BR, Neuberg D, Bromley B, Frigoletto FL). Sonographic scoring index for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities. J Ultrasound Med 1992: 11:449-458.

Benacerraf BR, Nadel A, Bromley B. Identification of second-trimester fetuses with autosomal trisomy by use of a sonographic scoring index. Radiology 1994; 193:135-140.

Babcook CJ, Goldstein RB, Filly RA. Prenatally detected fetal myelomeningocele: is karyotype analysis warranted?. Radiology 1995.

Nyberg DA, Kramer D, Resta RG et al. Prenatal sonographic findings of trisomy 18: review of 47 cases. J Ultrasound Med 1993; 12:103-113.

Nicolaides KH, Campbell S. Ultrasound diagnosis of congenital abnormalities. En: Milunsky A, ed. Genetic disorders and the fetus, diagnosis, prevention and treatment. 3a. ed., Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1992:593-648.

Root S, Carey JC. Survival in trisomy 18. Am J Med Genet 1994. 49:170-174.

Baty BJ, Blackburn BL, Carey JC. Natural history of trisomy 18 and trisomy 13: I. growth, physical assessment, medical histories. Survival and recurrence risk. Am J Med Genet 1994; 49: 175-188.

Baty BJ, Jorde LB, Blackburn BL, Catey JC. Natural history of trisomy 18 and trisomy 13: Il. psychomotor development. Am J Med Genet 1994: 49: 189_194.

Faix RG, Barr M, Waterson JR. Triploidy: case report of a liveborn male and an ethical dilemma. Pediatrics 1984; 74:296-299.

Romero R, Ghidini A, Santolaya J. Fetal blood sampling. En: Milunsky A, ed. Genetic disorders and the fetus, diagnosis, ptevention and treatment. 3a. ed., Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. 1992:649

Downloads

Published

2000-03-01

How to Cite

Fetal karyotypes of high genetic risk pregnancies from Social Security Hospitals and Private Consultations. (2000). Acta Médica Costarricense , 42(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v42i1.539