Comparative analysis of home drug use by older adults in rural and urban areas

Authors

  • Desiree Sáenz Campos Universidad de Costa Rica
  • Adriana Laclé Murray Instituto de Investigaciones en Salud

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v41i2.507

Keywords:

fármacos, medicamentos, adulto mayor, polimedicación

Abstract

The use of drugs and pharmacologycal therapeutics are influenced by the local form of health services and the possibility to have access to such products, and also to economical, social and cultural conditions.

Objective: To describe and compare a selfreported medication profile of the elderly according to heir place of residence urban (UR) orrural (RU).

Methods: Astratified sample (n= 180) by age groups (55-64 years, 65-74 years, 75 years and more) and sex (90 males= M, 90 females= F) were homed interviewed in different living areas RU and UR, with a predesigned instrument to standarized the information. For each drug its particular referred dose was used. Chi-square was use for comparative analysis with a 0.05 as criterion of significance.

Results: 77% they ofthe interviewees took medicines, 83% UR and 69% RU (p<O.01). The disposition of medications was different for zone and sex: in UR area 89% (2.5 ( 1.9 drug/ person) and 80% (1.9 ( 1.5 drug/person); in RU, 80% (1.6 ( 1.5 drug/person) and M= 60% (I .5 ( 1.7 drug/person)

(p<O.01 They referred chronic use ofmedications 83% UR (F= 85%, 64%) and RU 97%, 81%); origin from a medical prescription was confirmed by the interviewer, 79% UR 80%, 78%) and 90% RU 94%, 85%).

In general, the most prevalent medications were those for the cardiovascular and musculareskeletal systems; in UR there was a significantly higher use of drugs agents for the digestive tract (F= 16%) and for the central nervous system (M= 30%).

Conclusion: From 55 years and over, a great majority of people employed medications, and the agents were used in a chronic form. They are consumed more in urban than in the rural setting, but in both cases the women used them to a greater expense. Fortunately, the use of pharmaceutical products from medical prescription prevails.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Morselli, PL.: Effect of age on the dose response curve. En Lasagna L, Erill S, Naranjo CA (Eds.): Dose-response relationships in clinical pharmacology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science PublishersB.V., 1989: 187—197.

Goldstein MK.: Ethical considerations in phannacotherapy ofthe aged. Drugs Aging 199, 2 (I): 91-97.

Montamat SC, Cusack B.: Overcoming problems with polypharmacy and drug misuse in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 1992, 8: 143-58.

Gupta S, Rappaport HM, Bennett L.: Polypharmacy among nursing home geriatric medicaid recipients. Ann Pharmacother 1996, 30:946-50.

Laclé A.: Estudio piloto del proyecto "Determinantes de un envejecimiento sano en Costa Rica" I Parte: Selección y descripción sociodemográfica de la muestra utilizada. Acta Méd cost, 1998,

United States Pharmacopeia: USP DI Drug Information for the Health Care Professional (vol I), 17th edition. Maryland: The United States Pharmacoleial Convention Inc., 1997.

Laclé A.: Morbilidad en el adulto mayor: Comparación de una comunidad urbana y otra rural. San José: LVIII Congreso Médico Nacional, 2-7 diciembre, 1996.

Sáenz-Campos D.: Estudio comparativo de la prescripción de fármacos a pacientes mayores y menores de 60 años en consulta externa de medicina general. Fármacos 1990, 6 (I): 42-48.

ChenHsu R-Y, Lin M-s, Chou M-H, Lin M-F.: Medication use characteristics in a ambulatory elderly population in Taiwan. Ann Pharmacother 1997, 31

Nobili A, Tettamanti M, Frattura L, Spagnoli A, Ferraro L, Marrazzo E, et al. Drug use by the elderly in Italy. Ann

Pharmacoter 1997,31

Downloads

Published

1999-06-01

How to Cite

Comparative analysis of home drug use by older adults in rural and urban areas. (1999). Acta Médica Costarricense , 41(2), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v41i2.507