Radiation in everyday life

Authors

  • Patricia Mora Rodríguez Universidad de Costa Rica

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v41i2.504

Keywords:

radiación, dosis, radiación natural, uranio, BERT

Abstract

The medical community benefits on a daily basis from the ionizing radiations used in the diagnosis and treatment of disease. The doses received in the medical field are only a small fraction of the total radiation received in a year. This bibliographic review has several objectives. The first one is to present the different components of natural radiation (background radiation). Secondly, it Will introduce many consumer products that contain radioactive sources and expose our bodies. Third, arguments to diminish the radiation phobia Will be presented and finally an easy to understand dosimetric magnitude Will be introduced for the physician, the technologist and the patient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Evans R. TheAtomic Nucleus. United States of America: Mc Graw-Hi11, 1995.

Roy R.R., Nigan B.P. Nuclear Physics. Theory and Experiment. United States ofAmerica: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1967.

Cohen B. Concepts of Nuclear Physics, United States of America: 22. Pfeiffer W.

Penna-Franca E., Costa Ribeiro C. , et al. Mc Graw -Hill, 1971. Measurements of environmental radiation exposure dose rates at England: IOP Publishing Ltd., 1989:469-472.

Tschurlovits M. What is "ionizing radiation"? IAEACN. 67/51 : 683-691. selected sites in Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc. 1981.

Sunta C. M. A review of the studies of high background areas of biological effects and regulatory control. Vienna: IAEA, 1997: the SW coast of India.

Conference on High Levels of Natural Radiation Ramsar 1990. Vienna: IAEA, 1993:241-249.

Wahlstrom B. Radiation in everyday language. Finland: Loviisa, 1995.

El—Khatib A. M. and El—KhierA. Regional study of black radioactivity. Isotopen Praxis, 1988; 24:333-336.

Swiss Federal Office ofPublic Health. Environmental radioactivPractice 4th Int. Symp. of the Society for Radiological Protection. ity and radiation exposure in Switzerland. Bern, 1997.

Hall E. Radiation and life. USA: Pergmon Press, 1976, test methodology for a national survey. Radiat Prot Dosim, 1988; 24

Trevor E. Something about x-rays for everybody. USA: Medical Physics Publishing, 1989.

Lorfa G., Mora P. y Badilla M. K40 y CSI 37 en banano exportado por Costa Rica. Ciencia y tecnologfa: en prensa.

Kathren R. L. Radiation protection, Medical Physics Handbooks Great Britain: J. W. Arrowsmith Ltd., 1985.

Mora P. and Lorfa G. Radioactive assessment of fish products marketed by Costa Rica. Journal Trace and Microprobe

Hendee W. and Edwards F. Health effects of exposure to low level Techniques, 1997.

Hugh J.O. Radioactivity in public water supplies in England and Wales. En: Radiation Protection: Theory Il. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic and Practice 4th Int. Symp. of the Society for Radiological Radiation (UNSCEAR): Sources and Effects of Low Level Protection England: IOP Publishing Ltd., 1989: 309-312.

Radiation. New York: United Nations Publications, 1993. 30.

Gongora E. iQué son los reactores nucleares? La energía nuclear and Canada from natural background radiation. NCRP Report

Mettler F. and Upton A. Medical Effects of Ionizing Radiation. logical Protection England: IOP Publishing Ltd., 1989: 289-292. Philadelphia: W.B. Sander Company, 1995.

NCRP, Control of radon in houses. NCRPReport 103. USA

IAEA. The International Chernobyl Project: Technical Report. National Council on Radiation Protection, 1989.

IAEA. Measurement of radionucleides in food and the daughters. En: Radiation Protection: Theory and Practice 4th Int. environment, Technical Report 295, Vienna: International Atomic Symp. of the Society for Radiological Protection England: IOP Energy Agency, 1989. Publishing Ltd., 1989: 283-288.

Lorfa L. y Jiménez R. Medida de la concentraci6n de rad6n en Costa Rica. Journal of Trace and Microprobe Techniques, 1996; casas de habitaci6n de Costa Rica, utilizando detectores pasi vos de estado s61ido LR115 y Cr-39. Ciencia y Tecnologfa, 1993; 17(2): 89-104.

Mora P. y Salazar A. Nivelesderadiactividad en tres regiones de Costa Rica. Ciencia y Tecnologfa, 1995; 19(1 ,2):79-95. 36.

Mora P. Reporte interno para la Vicerrectorfa de Investigaci6n. on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1977. Proyecto: Radionuclefdos en la Atmosfera e Hidrosfera de Costa Rica, Segundo Semestre, 1998.

Cameron J.R. Argument against the motion that LNT model is appropriate for the estimation of risk from low-level (less than Sohrabi M. High level natural radiation areas with special regard mSv/year) radiation. Medical Physics, 1998; 25(3):276.

Mossman K. The linear no-threshold debate: where do we go from here? Medical Physics, 1998

Frenlin J.H. Power production: What are the risks? United Medical Physics, 1998

Cohen B.L. test of the Inear non-threshold theory of radiation: biological effects and regulatory control. Vienna. control. Vienna: IAEA, 1997; 683-686.

New York: American Association of Radiation. NCRP Report 100. USA: National Council on Physicists in Medicine, 1986.

ICRP. 1990 Recommendations of the ICRP Publicaton 60.

Decreto No. 24037-S. Reglamento sobre protección contra las radiaciones ionizantes. La Gaceta No. 48. Año CXVII .

NCRP. Evidence on radiation hormesis. NCRPReport 104. USA: National Council on Radiation Protection, 1990.

Okumura Y. And Mine M. Effects of low doses of A-bomb radiation on human lifespan (IAEA-CN-67/129). En: IAEATECDOC-976 Low doses ofionizing radiation: biological effects and regulatory control. Vienna: IAEA, 1997; 414-416.

Downloads

Published

1999-06-01

How to Cite

Radiation in everyday life. (1999). Acta Médica Costarricense , 41(2), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v41i2.504