Effects of the gender gap and mansplaining in the medical workplace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v67i3.1486Keywords:
Aggression, Gender Equity, Leadership, Women Physicians, WorkplaceAbstract
In recent years, the feminization of the medical profession has grown significantly, with women making up 56% of registered members in the Costa Rican Medical and Surgical College as of 2024. Despite this progress, a gender gap persists, limiting women’s access to leadership positions, a phenomenon known as the glass ceiling. It is also recognized that there are barriers and microaggressions that hinder the professional advancement of women in medicine. The objective of this review is to know the manifestations, effects, and approach to mansplaining in the professional performance of female physicians, as a form of microaggression that contributes to the gender gap and is capable of altering the quality of institutional health care. These microaggressions, often normalized, negatively impact the mental health and well-being of female physicians. Findings show that while women represent over 70% of the healthcare workforce, their presence in leadership roles remains low, as evidenced during the Covid-19 pandemic. Structural changes in workplace policies and the creation of inclusive programs promoting gender equity are recommended. This research contributes to gender studies by proposing strategies to recognize and address microaggressions, fostering a more equitable organizational culture.
Downloads
References
1. Da Silva PR, Porto P, Rocha MC, Tamaki ER, Corrêa MG, Fernandez M, et al. Women and working in healthcare during the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil: bullying of colleagues. Global Health. 2023;19:10. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-00911-2
2. Petrone P. La feminización en la Medicina. Rev Colomb Cir. 2018;33:132-34. DOI: 10.30944/20117582.
3. Vargas-Acevedo C. La mujer en medicina: la normalización de una discriminación oculta. Univ Med. 2021; 62:201-205. DOI: 10.11144/Javeriana.umed62-4.muje
4. Caira-Tovar N. Brecha de Género: Una Mirada a la Lucha Contra el Techo de Cristal y el Suelo Pegajoso. Mujer Polít Públicas. 2022;1: 56-65. DOI: 10.31381/mpp.v1i1.5260
5. Rodríguez-Pérez RE, Castro-Lugo D, Ibarra-Gutiérrez S. Violencia laboral de género como factor que inhibe la participación de las mujeres en el mercado de trabajo de México. Rev Econ. 2022; 39: 110-133. DOI: 10.33937/reveco.2022.277
6. Smith J, Purewal S. Towards more caring and consultative crisis management: perspectives and experiences from women healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Leader; 2023;7:1-5. DOI: 10.1136/leader-2023-000793
7. Desai V, Conte AH, Nguyen VT, Shin P, Sudol NT, Hobbs J, et al. Veiled Harm: Impacts of Microaggressions on Psychological Safety and Physician Burnout. Perm J. 2023;27:169-178. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/23.017
8. Ortiz-Reyes FA, Fierro-Moreno E, Montes de Oca-López JC. Los micromachismos y el clima organizacional en un organismo académico de Educación Superior. RIICONET. 2020; 13:1322-1341.
9. Undurraga R, López-Hornickel N. Trayectorias Laborales de Mujeres y Violencia en el Trabajo: Una Cuestión de Género. Psykhe (Santiago). 2020; 29, 1-14. DOI: 10.7764/psykhe.29.2.1494
10. George AS, McConville FE, deVries S, Nigenda G, Sarfraz S, McIsaac M. Violence against female health workers is tip of iceberg of gender power imbalances. BMJ. 2020;371:m3546. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3546
11. Stroud L Reflections on sexism in medicine. CMAJ. 2020; 192:E324. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.74909
12. Cruz-Arroyo VB, Casique I. Violencia laboral. Análisis de los factores de riesgo y consecuencias en la vida de las mujeres trabajadoras en la Ciudad de México. Pap poblac. 2019; 25:51-79. DOI: 10.22185/24487147.2019.102.32
13. Flores-Sandí G, Salazar-Sánchez L. Concepto, Contextualización y Estrategias Administrativas de Abordaje del Gaslighting Laboral en Servicios de Salud. Una Revisión Sistemática. Salud Adm. 2024; 11:35-50.
14. Cherry MA, Wilcox MM. Sexist Microaggressions: Traumatic Stressors Mediated by Self-Compassion. TCP. 2020; 49:106-137. DOI: 10.1177/0011000020954534
15. Bailey L, Curry A. Leading and Mentoring Women in STEM: Mitigating Gender & Microaggressions. SWB Journal. 2023; 1:1-11. DOI: 10.57229/2834-2267.1026
16. Kim JY, Meister A. Microaggressions, Interrupted: The Experience and Effects of Gender Microaggressions for Women in STEM. J Bus Ethics. 2023; 185:513–531. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05203-0
17. Peralta-García L, Ufarte-Ruiz MJ, López-Caniego. Micromachismos y prensa digital: eldiario.es como estudio de caso. Icono14. 2019; 17:162-183. DOI: 10.7195/ri14.v17i1.1220
18. Ávila-Rodríguez B, Marín-Palacios C. Micromachismo, una asignatura pendiente en la universidad. Aula Encuentro. 2022; 24: 96-11. DOI: 10.17561/ae.v24n2.6543
19. Szyma?ska M. Gendered Neologisms Beyond Social Media: the Current Use of Mansplaining". RiL. 2023;20:259-76 DOI: 10.18778/1731-7533.20.3.03
20. Smith CJ, Schweitzer L, Lauch K, Bird A. ‘Well, actually’: investigating mansplaining in the modern workplace. JMO. 2022: 1-19. DOI: 10.1017/jmo.2022.81
21. Joyce JB, Huma B, Ristimäki HL, Almeida FF, Doehring A. Speaking out against everyday sexism: Gender and epistemics in accusations of “mansplaining”. Fem Psychol. 2021; 31: 502–529. DOI: 10.1177/0959353520979499
22. Choo EK, DeMayo RF. A lexicon for gender bias in academia and medicine. Mansplaining is the tip of the iceberg. BMJ; 2018;363:k5218. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k5218
23. Briggs CQ, Gardner DM, Ryan AM. Competence-Questioning Communication and Gender: Exploring Mansplaining, Ignoring, and Interruption Behaviors. J Bus Psychol. 2023:1-29. DOI: 10.1007/s10869-022-09871-7
24. Nelson S, Ayaz B, Baumann AL, Dozois G. A gender-based review of workplace violence amongst the global health workforce-A scoping review of the literature. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024;4:e0003336 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003336.
25. Women's Leadership in Global Health Efforts. Dent Abstr. 2023;68:159-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.denabs.2023.03.002.
26. Omojemite MD, Cishe EN, Zibongiwe M. Gender Stereotyping and Social Norms: Exploring Theoretical Perspectives and Educational Implications. RESSAT 2024; 9: 77-92. DOI:10.46303/ressat.2024.48
27. Tremmel M, Wahl I. Gender stereotypes in leadership: Analyzing the content and evaluation of stereotypes about typical, male, and female leaders. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1034258. DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1034258
28. Llivichuzhca-Pillco A, López-Pérez R. Poder y género: carencias y dilemas. Andamios. 2023: 20:73-102. DOI: 10.29092/uacm.v20i52.999
29. Song Z, Li WD, Jin X, Ying J, Zhang X, Song Y, et al. Genetics, leadership position, and well-being: An investigation with a large-scale GWAS. PNAS. 2022; 119: e2114271119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2114271119
30. Reyes-López A, Salafranca-Biel J, Serrano-Aparicio JI, Bonfil-Celma P, Lereu-Bautista T, Martin-Esteban JM. El síndrome del impostor. Qué es, causas y cómo superarlo. Ocronos. 2024; 7: 1082.
31. Machado-López L, Morales-Molina T, Chávez-Calle LS. La igualdad de género, paradigma del desarrollo sostenible en la Agenda 2030. RUS. 2018;10: 7-13
32. Das P, Gupte M, Sahu M, Nagesh S. Tackling gender-based violence in public health workplaces in India: A call for systemic change. PLOS Glob Public Health .2025; 5: e0004327. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004327
33. Dhatt R, Theobald S, Buzuzi S, Ros B, Vong S, Muraya K, et al. The role of women's leadership and gender equity in leadership and health system strengthening. Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2017;2:e8. DOI: 10.1017/gheg.2016.22
34. Stephens EH, Heisler CA, Temkin SM, Miller P. The Current Status of Women in Surgery: How to Affect the Future. JAMA Surg. 2020;155:876-885. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0312
35. Ayaz B, Dozois G, Baumann AL, Fuseini A, Nelson S. Perpetrators of gender-based workplace violence amongst nurses and physicians–A scoping review of the literature. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4: e0003646. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003646
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Acta Médica Costarricense

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Los autores que publican en la revista Acta Médica Costarricense pueden distribuir, copiar, remezclar, retocar, leer, descargar, imprimir, buscar y crear a partir de su obra de modo no comercial, indicando los créditos a la revista y sus autores y compartir su obra en las mismas condiciones. Para ello se aplica la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)



