Survival and Its Determinants Among Patients Admitted to theIntensive Care Units of a Tertiary Hospital During 2023

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v68i1.1450

Keywords:

critical care, mortality, shock, acute kidney injury, and respiratory distress syndrome

Abstract

Aim: To describe the epidemiological profile, the incidence of organ dysfunction and organ support at admission, as well as survival and factors associated with reduced survival among patients admitted to the intensive care units of Hospital México during 2023. Methods: Observational, descriptive cohort study based on a retrospective review of clinical data available in the institutional database of the Intensive Care Service of Hospital México, a tertiary-level general hospital within the Costa Rican Social Security System. All patients admitted between January 1 and December 31, 2023, with a length of stay greater than 24 hours were included. Demographic variables, comorbidities, organ dysfunctions at admission, and need for organ support were analyzed. Mortality was verified through review of the electronic medical record and the Civil Registry of Costa Rica. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method at the in-hospital level, at 28 days, and at 180 days. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression to identify factors associated with mortality. Results: A total of 965 patients were included, with a median age of 54 years (P25–P75: 41–67); 61.8% were men, and 27.0% were aged 65 years or older. The median SOFA score was 5 (P25–P75: 1–9). The most frequent comorbidities were hypertension (43.9%), heart disease (20.7%), and diabetes mellitus (21.0%), none of which were significantly associated with ICU mortality. ICU survival was 83.4% (adjusted 85.7%), 28-day survival was 80.2%, and 180-day survival was 68.2%. In multivariable analysis, lower survival was associated with shock at admission (HR 5.3; 95% CI 3.5–8.2), acute kidney injury (HR 4.7; 95% CI 3.3–6.7), sepsis (HR 3.0; 95% CI 2.2–4.2), acute gastrointestinal injury (HR 3.0; 95% CI 1.9–4.8), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (HR 2.9; 95% CI 2.0–4.1). The need for vasopressors (HR 14.7; 95% CI 7.2–30.0; p<0.001), mechanical ventilation (HR 11.9; 95% CI 5.6–33.7), and renal replacement therapy (HR 3.3; 95% CI 2.3–4.7) was associated with a significantly higher risk of death. Conclusions: Overall survival among critically ill patients at Hospital México during 2023 was 83% in the ICU, 80% at 28 days, and 68% at 180 days. No comorbidity at admission was associated with reduced survival. Acute organ dysfunction syndromes, particularly shock, acute kidney injury, sepsis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome, were associated with lower survival. The requirement for vasopressor support, mechanical ventilation, or renal replacement therapy had the greatest negative impact on survival.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Salas-Segura, D. A, Barrantes-Morales, F., Campos-Vargas, C., Argüello-Quirós, M. F. Sobrevida a los 28 días y condición mental y física de los pacientes egresados de una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de tercer nivel. Acta méd costarricen. 2016; 58: 22-26. DOI: 10.51481/amc.v58i1.909

2. Martín MC, Cabré LI, Ruiz J, Blanch LI, Blanco J, Castillo F, et al. Indicadores de calidad en el enfermo crítico. Medicina intensiva. 2008;32:23-32. DOI:10.1016/S0210-5691(08)70899-4

3. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. Jama. 2016;315:788-800. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291

4. Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos F, Alía I, Brochard L, Stewart TE, et al. Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. Jama. 2002;287:345-55. DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.3.345.

5. Burke E, Haber E, Pike CW, Sonti R. Outcomes of renal replacement therapy in the critically ill with COVID-19. Medicina intensiva. 2021;1;45:325-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.medine.2021.02.006

6. Lambden S, Laterre PF, Levy MM, Francois B. The SOFA score—development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials. Critical Care. 2019;23:374. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2663-7

7. Vincent JL, Marshall JC, Ñamendys-Silva SA, François B, Martin-Loeches I, Lipman J, et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. The lancet Respiratory medicine. 2014;2:380-6. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70061-X

8. Nash DM, Przech S, Wald R, O'Reilly D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of renal replacement therapy modalities for acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit. Journal of critical care. 2017;41:138-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.002

9. Capuzzo M, Volta CA, Tassinati T, Moreno RP, Valentin A, Guidet B, et al. Hospital mortality of adults admitted to Intensive Care Units in hospitals with and without Intermediate Care Units: a multicentre European cohort study. Critical Care. 2016; 18: 1-15. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-014-0551-8

10. Nielsson MS, Christiansen CF, Johansen MB, Rasmussen BS, Tønnesen E, Nørgaard M. Mortality in elderly ICU patients: a cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2014; 58: 19-26. DOI: 10.1111/aas.12211. Epub 2013 Oct 13.

11. Leblanc G, Boumendil A, Guidet B. Ten things to know about critically ill elderly patients. Intensive care medicine. 2017; 43: 217-219. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4477-2.

12. Guidet B, Vallet H, Boddaert J, De Lange DW, Morandi A, Leblanc G, et al. Caring for the critically ill patients over 80: a narrative review. Annals of intensive care. 2018; 8: 1-15. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-018-0458-7

13. Atramont A, Lindecker-Cournil V, Rudant J, Tajahmady A, Drewniak N, Fouard A, et al. Association of age with short-term and long-term mortality among patients discharged from intensive care units in France. JAMA Network Open. 2019; 2: e193215-e193215. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3215

14. Laclé-Murray A, Valero-Juan LF. Incidencia de diabetes tipo 2 en un área urbano marginal de Costa Rica. Acta méd costarricen. 2008; 50: 29-34. DOI: 10.51481/amc.v50i1.349

15. Hawari FI, Al Najjar TI, Zaru L, Salah S H, Mukhaimar MZ. The effect of implementing high-intensity intensive care unit staffing model on outcome of critically ill oncology patients. Critical care medicine. 2009; 37: 1967-1971. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a0077c

16. McGrath, S., Chatterjee, F., Whiteley, C., & Ostermann, M. ICU and 6-month outcome of oncology patients in the intensive care unit. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2010; 103: 397-403. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq032.

17. Darmon M, Bourmaud A, Georges Q, Soares M, Jeon K, Oeyen S, et al. Changes in critically ill cancer patients’ short-term outcome over the last decades: results of systematic review with meta-analysis on individual data. Intensive care medicine. 2019; 45: 977-987. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05653-7.

18. Bauer M, Gerlach H, Vogelmann T, Preissing F, Stiefel J, Adam D. Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019—results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care. 2020; 24: 1-9. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-02950-2.

19. Glance LG, Li Y, Osler TM, Dick A, Mukamel DB. Impact of patient volume on the mortality rate of adult intensive care unit patients. Critical care medicine. 2006; 34: 1925-1934. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000226415.93237.84.

20. Xixi NA, Kremmydas P, Xourgia E, Giannopoulou V, Sarri K, Siempos I. Association between timing of intubation and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients: A meta-analysis. Journal of Critical Care. 2022; 71: 154062. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154062.

21. Andonovic M, Shemilt R, Sim M, Traynor JP, Shaw M, Mark B, et al. Timing of renal replacement therapy for patients with acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 2021; 22: 67-77. DOI: 10.1177/1751143720901688

22. Beck V, Chateau D, Bryson GL, Pisipati A, Zanotti S, Parrillo JE, et al. Cooperative Antimicrobial Therapy of Septic Shock (CATSS) Database Research Group. Timing of vasopressor initiation and mortality in septic shock: a cohort study. Critical care. 2014; 18: 1-8. DOI: 10.1186/cc13868.

23. Renaud B, Brun?Buisson C, Santin A, Coma E, Noyez C, Fine MJ, et al. Outcomes of early, late, and no admission to the intensive care unit for patients hospitalized with community?acquired pneumonia. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2012; 19: 294-303. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01301.x.

24. Cardoso LT, Grion CM, Matsuo T, Anami EH, Kauss IA, Seko L, et al. Impact of delayed admission to intensive care units on mortality of critically ill patients: a cohort study. Critical care. 2011; 15: 1-8. DOI: 10.1186/cc9975.

25. Hourmant Y, Mailloux A, Valade S, Lemiale V, Azoulay E, Darmon M. Impact of early ICU admission on outcome of critically ill and critically ill cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of critical care. 2021; 61: 82-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.10.008.

26. Orsini J, Rajayer S, Ahmad N, Din N, Morante J, Malik R, et al. Effects of time and day of admission on the outcome of critically ill patients admitted to ICU. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives. 2016; 6: 33478. DOI: 10.3402/jchimp.v6.33478

27. King J, O’Neill B, Ramsay P, Linden MA, Darweish Medniuk A, Outtrim J et al. Identifying patients’ support needs following critical illness: a scoping review of the qualitative literature. Critical care. 2019; 23: 1-12. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2441-6

28. Rawal G, Yadav S, Kumar, R. Post-intensive care syndrome: an overview. Journal of translational internal medicine. 2017; 5: 90-92. DOI: 10.1515/jtim-2016-0016

29. Hiser SL, Fatima A, Ali M, Needham DM. Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS): recent updates. Journal of intensive care. 2023; 11: 23. DOI: 10.1186/s40560-023-00670-7

Downloads

Published

2026-09-02

How to Cite

Survival and Its Determinants Among Patients Admitted to theIntensive Care Units of a Tertiary Hospital During 2023. (2026). Acta Médica Costarricense , 68(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v68i1.1450