Biobanks in anatomic pathology services in Costa Rica: a bioethical and biolaw analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v64i4.1245

Keywords:

tissue banks, biolaw, bioethics, informed consent, confidentiality, Pathology Department

Abstract

Aim: To analyze the bioethical and bio juridical framework regarding biobanks in the Pathology Departments.

Methods: Descriptive bibliographical revision of relevant information regarding bioethics and bio law with focus on the pathological anatomy services. Local laws, international laws and normative linked to biobanks and data bases were taken into
consideration. Text books from the Universidad de Costa Rica`s Library, Documentation and Information System were consulted and also digital platforms as Academic Google and PubMed.
Results: A new tool of scientific interest has emerged internationally with the medical advancement in the development of new therapeutic and diagnostic techniques: the establishment of tissue biobanks to preserve biological samples for molecular studies and research. This brought with it a number of questions relevant to bioethics and biolaw related to human rights and the respect for human dignity. In order to establish a biobank in a pathological anatomy department, it is essential to know, how to manage and implement the national and international regulations related to informed consent and the protection of data linked to biological samples.
Conclusions: National and international guidelines for using biological samples stored in pathology departments for research purposes must be followed. They must regulate the management, use and storage of samples. Also, the informed consent and the protection and confidentiality of the data regarding the incumbent people in biomedical research must be take into consideration. In Costa Rica, the ethical and juridical framework
related to the biomedical research establishes the parameters of biospecimens in clinical rehearsals but there is not a national legislation regarding biobanks. Because of that, is that is recommended a regulation that must include all the requirements for a biobank either in the public and private spectrum; such as a national law and formal regulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kalten C, Toper M, Sahin Y, Erdogdu, I. Pathology and Biobanking. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2020; 36:93-108. DOI: 10.5146/tjpath.2020.01482.

Caenazzo L, Tozzo P. The future of biobanking: what Is next? Bio Tech. 2020; 9:1-6. DOI: 10.3390/biotech9040023.

Sanz N, Díaz P, Daley M. La superación profesional en técnicas cuantitativas: una necesidad en Anatomía Patológica. Edumecentro. 2018; 10:205-210.

Ávila F, Guillen R, Avendaño V. La anatomía patológica presente y futuro. Rev Arbitr Interdiscip Cienc Salud 2019; 3:551-567. DOI: 10.35381/s.v.v3i6.331.

Rivera J. Futuro de los archivos de material tisular en los servicios de anatomía patológica. Rev Esp Patol. 2008; 41: 1-2.

Vidal, T, Ibarra, A. Anatomía patológica y tumores hereditarios. Rev Med Clin Condes. 2017; 28:591-597. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmclc.2017.07.002.

Fernández P, Ferrer B, Campo E. Bancos de tumores: papel en la investigación biomédica del presente y el futuro. Cir Esp. 2004; 76:4-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-739X(04)72346-5.

Garza M, Pérez A, Monsivais D, Velázquez J, Barrera H. El biobanco institucional como pilar de las ciencias médicas. Salud Publica Mex. 2016; 58:483-489.

Botti G, Franco R, Cantile M, Ciliberto G, Ascierto P. Tumor biobanks in translational medicine. J Transl Med. 2012; 10:204-206. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-204.

del Vallea M, Garraa, M. Banco de tumores: consideraciones desde la bioética. Rev Hosp Niños. 2015; 57:44-50.

Álava E, Ariasb J, Arizac A, Cuatrecasasd M, Fernández P, Morentee M, et. al. Preguntas y recomendaciones sobre integración de los archivos diagnósticos de los servicios de anatomía patológica en biobancos. Rev Esp Patol. 2012; 45:215-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.patol.2012.08.001.

Soto, L. Regulating mexican biobanks for human biomedical research: what can be learned from the European experience? Mex Law Rev. 2014; 7:31-55. DOI: 10.1016/S1870-0578(16)30007-5.

Argudo V., Doménech M. Publicaciones sobre los aspectos éticos, legales y sociales en los biobancos entre 2011-2018. Una revisión panorámica. Rev Esp Salud Pública. 2020; 94:25.

Meir K, Cohen Y, Mee B, Gaffney E. Biobank networking for dissemination of data and resources: an overview. J. Biorepos Sci Appl Med. 2014; 2: 29-42. DOI: 10.2147/BSAM.S46577.

Iacomussi S. Regulating Biobanks: An ethical analysis of the spanish law and the new challenges of the bigdata-driven biomedical. Rev Bio y Der. 2021; 53:215-233. DOI: 10.1344/rbd2021.53.32834.

Doménech N, Cal N. Biobancos y su importancia en el ámbito clínico y científico en relación con la investigación biomédica en España. Reumatol Clin. 2014; 10:304-308. DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2014.02.011.

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Biobanks in anatomic pathology services in Costa Rica: a bioethical and biolaw analysis. (2022). Acta Médica Costarricense , 64(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.51481/amc.v64i4.1245